Documentation

SpherePacking.ModularForms.EisensteinAsymptotics

Asymptotic Behavior of Eisenstein Series #

This file establishes the asymptotic behavior of Eisenstein series as z → i∞, and constructs the ModularForm structures for Serre derivatives.

Main definitions #

Main results #

Cauchy estimates and limits at infinity #

If f is holomorphic and bounded at infinity, then D f → 0 at i∞.

Proof via Cauchy estimates: For z with large Im, consider the ball B(z, Im(z)/2) in ℂ.

  • Ball is contained in upper half plane: all points have Im > Im(z)/2 > 0
  • f ∘ ofComplex is holomorphic on the ball (from MDifferentiable)
  • f is bounded by M for Im ≥ A (from IsBoundedAtImInfty)
  • By Cauchy: |deriv(f ∘ ofComplex)(z)| ≤ M / (Im(z)/2) = 2M/Im(z)
  • D f = (2πi)⁻¹ * deriv(...), so |D f(z)| ≤ M/(π·Im(z)) → 0

Limits of Eisenstein series at infinity #

theorem tendsto_exp_neg_mul_atTop {c : } (hc : 0 < c) :
Filter.Tendsto (fun (y : ) => Real.exp (-c * y)) Filter.atTop (nhds 0)

exp(-c * y) → 0 as y → +∞ (for c > 0).

If f = O(exp(-c * Im z)) as z → i∞ for c > 0, then f → 0 at i∞.

E₂ - 1 = O(exp(-2π·Im z)) at infinity.

Boundedness lemmas #

E₆ is bounded at infinity (as a modular form).

serre_D 1 E₂ is bounded at infinity.

D E₄ is bounded at infinity (by Cauchy estimate: D f → 0 when f is bounded).

Construction of ModularForm from serre_D #

Limit of serre_D at infinity (for determining scalar) #

General limit: if f → c at i∞ and f is holomorphic and bounded, then serre_D k f → -k*c/12.

This is the continuous mapping theorem applied to serre_D k f = D f - (k/12) * E₂ * f:

  • D f → 0 (Cauchy estimate from boundedness)
  • E₂ → 1
  • f → c Therefore serre_D k f → 0 - (k/12) * 1 * c = -k*c/12.

serre_D 4 E₄ → -1/3 at i∞.

serre_D 6 E₆ → -1/2 at i∞.

serre_D 1 E₂ is a weight-4 modular form. Note: E₂ itself is NOT a modular form, but serre_D 1 E₂ IS.

Equations
Instances For

    serre_D 1 E₂ → -1/12 at i∞.

    Generic q-expansion summability and derivative bounds #

    theorem summable_pow_shift (k : ) :
    Summable fun (m : ) => (m + 1) ^ k * Real.exp (-2 * Real.pi * m)

    Summability of (m+1)^k * exp(-2πm) via comparison with shifted sum.

    theorem qexp_deriv_bound_of_coeff_bound {a : ℕ+} {k : } (ha : ∀ (n : ℕ+), a n n ^ k) (K : Set ) :
    K {w : | 0 < w.im}IsCompact K∃ (u : ℕ+), Summable u ∀ (n : ℕ+) (z : K), a n * (2 * Real.pi * Complex.I * n) * Complex.exp (2 * Real.pi * Complex.I * n * z) u n

    Derivative bounds for q-expansion coefficients. Given ‖a n‖ ≤ n^k, produces bounds ‖a n * 2πin * exp(2πin z)‖ ≤ 2π * n^(k+1) * exp(-2πn * y_min) on compact K ⊆ {z : 0 < z.im}. This is a key hypothesis for D_qexp_tsum_pnat.